Aim 2 Results

Repeatability for DL reconstructions

The bias, repeatability coefficient (RC), intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC) and 95% confidence interval comparing scan A vs B are tabulated in Table 1. Bland-Altman plots are shown in Figure 1.

Figure 1: Bland-Altman analysis of repeatability for T1 and T2

Table 1: Repeatability analysis of T1 and T2.

(a) T1
map name Bias RC CoV ICC (95% CI) P-value
MOLLI aha1 17.5 132.7 3% 0.507 (-0.071, 0.836) p=0.04
MOLLI aha2 18.8 86.7 2.8% 0.612 (0.083, 0.877) p=0.014
MOLLI aha3 7.1 45.6 1.6% 0.845 (0.517, 0.958) p<0.001
MOLLI aha4 -4.5 72.4 2.1% 0.613 (0.05, 0.886) p=0.018
MOLLI aha5 17.5 84.5 2.4% 0.562 (0.006, 0.858) p=0.024
MOLLI aha6 34.4 119.0 3% 0.084 (-0.497, 0.625) p=0.391
MOLLI aha7 7.2 71.2 2.1% 0.843 (0.577, 0.949) p<0.001
MOLLI aha8 21.2 67.1 1.9% 0.638 (0.179, 0.872) p=0.006
MOLLI aha9 16.4 42.3 1.4% 0.757 (0.37, 0.922) p<0.001
MOLLI aha10 15.6 48.3 1.4% 0.649 (0.108, 0.898) p=0.012
MOLLI aha11 25.3 91.1 2.2% 0.454 (-0.14, 0.814) p=0.062
MOLLI aha12 24.9 93.3 2.3% 0.501 (-0.024, 0.814) p=0.03
MOLLI aha13 30.6 72.2 2.5% 0.553 (0.023, 0.845) p=0.021
MOLLI aha14 35.7 59.3 2.6% 0.543 (0.034, 0.833) p=0.019
MOLLI aha15 31.6 70.7 2.3% 0.496 (-0.12, 0.844) p=0.052
MOLLI aha16 14.4 88.1 2.5% 0.651 (0.175, 0.884) p=0.006
MOLLI sept_1_mean 13.1 58.1 2.1% 0.769 (0.369, 0.931) p=0.001
MOLLI sept_2_mean 16.1 71.7 2% 0.571 (0.048, 0.852) p=0.017
MOLLI sept_3_mean 28.1 72.6 2.6% 0.578 (0.085, 0.848) p=0.013
SMART aha1 -33.2 155.8 3.6% -0.15 (-0.695, 0.526) p=0.66
SMART aha2 4.6 81.6 1.5% 0.497 (-0.159, 0.857) p=0.062
SMART aha3 15.3 45.2 1.1% 0.724 (0.159, 0.937) p=0.01
SMART aha4 -17.9 68.3 1.6% 0.471 (-0.296, 0.881) p=0.104
SMART aha5 -3.8 193.9 3.2% 0.502 (-0.152, 0.859) p=0.06
SMART aha6 20.4 97.5 2.1% -0.299 (-0.768, 0.403) p=0.801
SMART aha7 -4.0 49.4 1.2% 0.594 (0.109, 0.854) p=0.01
SMART aha8 5.6 110.0 2.1% 0.073 (-0.463, 0.579) p=0.397
SMART aha9 27.2 125.2 2.1% 0.178 (-0.422, 0.68) p=0.282
SMART aha10 -18.9 64.5 1.6% 0.528 (-0.117, 0.868) p=0.05
SMART aha11 1.7 126.5 2.8% 0.586 (-0.034, 0.887) p=0.031
SMART aha12 23.4 129.1 2.2% 0.294 (-0.264, 0.712) p=0.146
SMART aha13 5.5 90.7 2.1% 0.709 (0.277, 0.905) p=0.002
SMART aha14 28.7 150.1 3.2% 0.024 (-0.52, 0.565) p=0.465
SMART aha15 -5.1 130.7 2.5% 0.734 (0.227, 0.932) p=0.006
SMART aha16 15.3 88.6 2.2% 0.884 (0.642, 0.967) p<0.001
SMART sept_1_mean 7.6 74.5 1.6% 0.475 (-0.147, 0.835) p=0.062
SMART sept_2_mean 20.2 129.2 2.7% -0.089 (-0.637, 0.537) p=0.6
SMART sept_3_mean 24.1 149.0 3.2% 0.076 (-0.481, 0.599) p=0.397
(b) T2
map name Bias RC CoV ICC (95% CI) P-value
T2 aha1 0.1 5.7 3.2% 0.608 (0.001, 0.894) p=0.025
T2 aha2 0.3 9.3 3.6% 0.256 (-0.417, 0.761) p=0.226
T2 aha3 1.5 6.9 4% 0.822 (0.46, 0.952) p<0.001
T2 aha4 -0.1 8.1 4.7% 0.421 (-0.251, 0.829) p=0.101
T2 aha5 -0.3 3.9 2% 0.885 (0.599, 0.972) p<0.001
T2 aha6 0.6 5.5 2.9% 0.707 (0.213, 0.917) p=0.005
T2 aha7 1.2 4.6 2.6% 0.584 (0.069, 0.858) p=0.015
T2 aha8 1.4 8.1 4.4% -0.377 (-0.76, 0.216) p=0.9
T2 aha9 1.4 4.5 2.3% 0.404 (-0.17, 0.78) p=0.078
T2 aha10 0.4 6.7 3% 0.696 (0.254, 0.901) p=0.003
T2 aha11 0.9 3.3 2.1% 0.849 (0.573, 0.953) p<0.001
T2 aha12 0.8 3.7 2% 0.411 (-0.162, 0.783) p=0.074
T2 aha13 1.1 8.6 4.5% 0.328 (-0.281, 0.757) p=0.139
T2 aha14 1.6 7.4 4.4% 0.372 (-0.206, 0.765) p=0.097
T2 aha15 1.0 4.6 2.6% 0.726 (0.309, 0.911) p=0.002
T2 aha16 0.4 3.9 2% 0.796 (0.429, 0.94) p<0.001
T2 sept_1_mean 1.9 12.8 3.5% 0.573 (-0.013, 0.872) p=0.027
T2 sept_2_mean 0.7 6.6 3% 0.192 (-0.385, 0.67) p=0.257
T2 sept_3_mean 1.4 7.6 4.4% 0.39 (-0.186, 0.773) p=0.086
T2fast aha1 -2.1 8.0 4.6% 0.032 (-0.56, 0.617) p=0.457
T2fast aha2 0.9 11.6 4.9% 0.238 (-0.433, 0.752) p=0.242
T2fast aha3 0.4 9.3 4.8% 0.754 (0.269, 0.938) p=0.004
T2fast aha4 -0.4 18.1 9.4% -0.002 (-0.609, 0.626) p=0.497
T2fast aha5 -4.7 19.4 10% -0.371 (-0.799, 0.333) p=0.857
T2fast aha6 -2.2 10.4 4.7% 0.252 (-0.386, 0.738) p=0.217
T2fast aha7 2.0 6.3 3.6% 0.319 (-0.263, 0.738) p=0.136
T2fast aha8 2.0 11.3 5.6% -0.062 (-0.58, 0.503) p=0.578
T2fast aha9 0.6 6.8 3.6% 0.602 (0.096, 0.865) p=0.012
T2fast aha10 -1.9 9.1 4.9% 0.565 (0.04, 0.85) p=0.019
T2fast aha11 -1.3 10.6 5.3% 0.351 (-0.229, 0.754) p=0.111
T2fast aha12 0.0 3.5 2% 0.828 (0.523, 0.946) p<0.001
T2fast aha13 3.1 10.6 6.3% 0.242 (-0.366, 0.714) p=0.215
T2fast aha14 2.1 13.4 5.8% 0.11 (-0.454, 0.621) p=0.354
T2fast aha15 -0.2 6.8 3.8% 0.527 (-0.043, 0.844) p=0.034
T2fast aha16 1.2 7.5 4.2% 0.606 (0.072, 0.875) p=0.015
T2fast sept_1_mean 0.9 8.4 3.3% 0.695 (0.15, 0.921) p=0.01
T2fast sept_2_mean 0.7 7.5 3.9% 0.426 (-0.144, 0.79) p=0.066
T2fast sept_3_mean 2.2 12.9 5.8% 0.14 (-0.43, 0.639) p=0.317

Between-system reproducibility

The bias, reproducibility coefficient (RC), intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC) and 95% confidence interval comparing scan A vs B are tabulated in Table 2. Bland-Altman plots are shown in Figure 2.

Figure 2: Bland-Altman analysis of between-system reproducibility for T1 and T2

Table 2: Between-system reproducibility analysis of T1 and T2.

(a) T1
map name Bias RC CoV ICC (95% CI) P-value
MOLLI aha1 -20.2 123.0 3.6% 0.46 (-0.103, 0.805) p=0.051
MOLLI aha2 -4.4 97.9 2.6% 0.436 (-0.133, 0.794) p=0.062
MOLLI aha3 3.1 74.8 2% 0.485 (-0.071, 0.816) p=0.041
MOLLI aha4 -40.7 100.5 3.3% 0.427 (-0.172, 0.803) p=0.075
MOLLI aha5 -23.9 79.4 2.6% 0.563 (0.007, 0.858) p=0.024
MOLLI aha6 -6.2 100.4 2.9% 0.615 (0.116, 0.87) p=0.01
MOLLI aha7 12.4 132.5 3.3% 0.56 (0.101, 0.825) p=0.01
MOLLI aha8 19.7 82.2 2.4% 0.627 (0.202, 0.856) p=0.004
MOLLI aha9 4.0 64.6 1.8% 0.732 (0.381, 0.9) p<0.001
MOLLI aha10 1.0 61.4 1.7% 0.776 (0.449, 0.921) p<0.001
MOLLI aha11 2.2 81.3 2.3% 0.586 (0.097, 0.851) p=0.012
MOLLI aha12 17.9 100.3 3% 0.716 (0.334, 0.898) p<0.001
MOLLI aha13 44.0 238.4 5.6% 0.049 (-0.501, 0.582) p=0.432
MOLLI aha14 -9.1 105.3 3.1% 0.655 (0.229, 0.873) p=0.003
MOLLI aha15 15.0 96.6 2.6% 0.746 (0.371, 0.914) p<0.001
MOLLI aha16 41.0 178.2 4.5% 0.553 (0.023, 0.845) p=0.021
MOLLI sept_1_mean 0.5 81.2 2.1% 0.483 (-0.073, 0.815) p=0.042
MOLLI sept_2_mean 18.2 91.9 2.7% 0.545 (0.079, 0.818) p=0.013
MOLLI sept_3_mean -5.1 100.6 2.8% 0.737 (0.373, 0.906) p<0.001
SMART aha1 8.7 69.4 1.6% 0.698 (0.196, 0.914) p=0.006
SMART aha2 -25.3 54.7 1.7% 0.664 (0.134, 0.903) p=0.01
SMART aha3 18.1 134.3 3% 0.038 (-0.532, 0.596) p=0.449
SMART aha4 26.6 144.8 3.1% 0.395 (-0.18, 0.776) p=0.083
SMART aha5 -14.9 137.2 3.3% 0.321 (-0.237, 0.726) p=0.124
SMART aha6 29.4 192.2 4.3% -0.016 (-0.53, 0.517) p=0.519
SMART aha7 7.6 58.0 1.5% 0.755 (0.407, 0.913) p<0.001
SMART aha8 -18.7 56.7 1.6% 0.746 (0.391, 0.91) p<0.001
SMART aha9 10.0 81.5 1.7% 0.503 (0.023, 0.798) p=0.021
SMART aha10 9.0 106.0 2.3% 0.527 (0.034, 0.817) p=0.019
SMART aha11 -31.7 108.7 3% 0.436 (-0.083, 0.774) p=0.047
SMART aha12 8.7 109.3 2.6% 0.598 (0.158, 0.843) p=0.006
SMART aha13 22.3 192.4 4.4% 0.406 (-0.168, 0.781) p=0.077
SMART aha14 -70.0 109.3 4% 0.419 (-0.127, 0.776) p=0.062
SMART aha15 6.0 232.8 5.5% 0.347 (-0.209, 0.74) p=0.105
SMART aha16 27.1 325.0 7.7% 0.176 (-0.399, 0.661) p=0.275
SMART sept_1_mean -5.4 67.9 1.5% 0.667 (0.14, 0.904) p=0.01
SMART sept_2_mean 1.9 65.9 1.4% 0.773 (0.443, 0.92) p<0.001
SMART sept_3_mean -93.7 111.6 5% 0.276 (-0.307, 0.716) p=0.173
(b) T2
map name Bias RC CoV ICC (95% CI) P-value
T2 aha1 1.7 10.1 5.8% 0.348 (-0.166, 0.718) p=0.088
T2 aha2 -2.3 7.9 5.3% 0.306 (-0.211, 0.695) p=0.118
T2 aha3 -1.0 11.9 6.7% 0.205 (-0.312, 0.634) p=0.217
T2 aha4 -1.9 9.0 5.4% 0.287 (-0.231, 0.684) p=0.134
T2 aha5 0.9 10.0 5.5% 0.192 (-0.325, 0.626) p=0.232
T2 aha6 0.8 11.8 6% -0.09 (-0.552, 0.422) p=0.63
T2 aha7 1.9 8.6 4.7% 0.572 (0.119, 0.831) p=0.009
T2 aha8 -0.2 11.8 6.4% -0.059 (-0.53, 0.448) p=0.584
T2 aha9 0.9 8.5 5.1% 0.071 (-0.43, 0.545) p=0.393
T2 aha10 0.1 6.3 3% -0.084 (-0.548, 0.427) p=0.621
T2 aha11 0.3 8.6 4.4% -0.138 (-0.598, 0.401) p=0.688
T2 aha12 0.8 8.9 5.1% 0.276 (-0.243, 0.677) p=0.144
T2 aha13 -1.2 13.8 6.7% 0.507 (0.027, 0.8) p=0.02
T2 aha14 -3.4 8.7 6.2% 0.7 (0.306, 0.892) p=0.001
T2 aha15 -3.1 14.9 5.6% 0.309 (-0.25, 0.72) p=0.134
T2 aha16 1.7 13.7 6.1% 0.121 (-0.445, 0.628) p=0.34
T2 sept_1_mean -1.3 7.2 3.8% 0.329 (-0.186, 0.708) p=0.1
T2 sept_2_mean 0.8 9.0 5.5% 0.219 (-0.299, 0.643) p=0.201
T2 sept_3_mean -3.3 10.3 6.1% 0.61 (0.157, 0.854) p=0.006
T2fast aha1 -0.4 7.7 4.1% 0.165 (-0.387, 0.638) p=0.28
T2fast aha2 0.0 12.4 6.5% -0.435 (-0.778, 0.121) p=0.942
T2fast aha3 1.4 11.0 6.1% -0.007 (-0.524, 0.523) p=0.507
T2fast aha4 4.5 14.4 8.1% -0.419 (-0.77, 0.14) p=0.934
T2fast aha5 0.8 13.9 7.3% -0.637 (-0.875, -0.135) p=0.991
T2fast aha6 -0.5 10.7 5.2% 0.333 (-0.248, 0.746) p=0.125
T2fast aha7 -0.5 12.2 5.7% 0.448 (-0.069, 0.78) p=0.042
T2fast aha8 -1.4 12.5 6.2% 0.227 (-0.31, 0.66) p=0.201
T2fast aha9 -0.9 9.5 3.7% 0.403 (-0.123, 0.757) p=0.063
T2fast aha10 -0.1 8.9 4% 0.245 (-0.292, 0.671) p=0.182
T2fast aha11 0.9 9.3 5% 0.301 (-0.236, 0.703) p=0.131
T2fast aha12 0.8 6.7 3.6% 0.685 (0.258, 0.891) p=0.003
T2fast aha13 -3.6 19.7 8.9% 0.376 (-0.201, 0.767) p=0.095
T2fast aha14 -2.3 15.1 7.6% 0.581 (0.113, 0.842) p=0.01
T2fast aha15 -4.1 16.7 7.1% 0.297 (-0.262, 0.713) p=0.144
T2fast aha16 -1.2 9.6 4.9% 0.628 (0.073, 0.891) p=0.015
T2fast sept_1_mean 1.1 9.9 5.1% -0.141 (-0.614, 0.419) p=0.685
T2fast sept_2_mean -1.0 10.4 5.7% 0.366 (-0.166, 0.738) p=0.084
T2fast sept_3_mean -2.6 14.8 7.5% 0.653 (0.225, 0.872) p=0.003

Between-sequence reproducibility

The bias, reproducibility coefficient (RC), intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC) and 95% confidence interval comparing MOLLI vs SMART and T2 vs T2fast are tabulated in Table 3. Bland-Altman plots are shown in Figure 3. (Non-inter-system: priority scan A \(\to\) B; inter-system: priority scan B \(\to\) A.) Bias for MOLLI vs SMART is substantial: SMART values are bigger, causing lack of agreement.

Figure 3: Bland-Altman analysis of between-sequence reproducibility for T1 and T2
Table 3: Between-sequence reproducibility analysis of T1 and T2.
name Bias RC CoV ICC (95% CI) P-value
MOLLI vs SMART aha1 -214.0 135.5 13.8% -0.693 (-0.818, -0.504) p=1
MOLLI vs SMART aha2 -240.6 92.2 15% -0.754 (-0.855, -0.598) p=1
MOLLI vs SMART aha3 -257.3 101.9 16.1% -0.762 (-0.859, -0.61) p=1
MOLLI vs SMART aha4 -221.6 145.3 14% -0.617 (-0.768, -0.398) p=1
MOLLI vs SMART aha5 -233.2 109.3 14.7% -0.675 (-0.806, -0.478) p=1
MOLLI vs SMART aha6 -219.9 111.9 14.1% -0.57 (-0.734, -0.341) p=1
MOLLI vs SMART aha7 -217.7 141.9 14.1% -0.666 (-0.797, -0.474) p=1
MOLLI vs SMART aha8 -255.6 75.9 15.9% -0.807 (-0.887, -0.68) p=1
MOLLI vs SMART aha9 -249.0 96.6 15.5% -0.788 (-0.876, -0.65) p=1
MOLLI vs SMART aha10 -221.4 96.2 14% -0.725 (-0.839, -0.549) p=1
MOLLI vs SMART aha11 -227.4 112.5 14.4% -0.72 (-0.835, -0.543) p=1
MOLLI vs SMART aha12 -213.9 107.9 13.6% -0.491 (-0.678, -0.244) p=1
MOLLI vs SMART aha13 -178.6 204.2 11.7% -0.504 (-0.687, -0.26) p=1
MOLLI vs SMART aha14 -269.2 118.1 16.1% -0.741 (-0.846, -0.581) p=1
MOLLI vs SMART aha15 -206.0 188.2 12.8% -0.522 (-0.703, -0.277) p=1
MOLLI vs SMART aha16 -142.9 230.6 10.1% -0.245 (-0.496, 0.045) p=0.952
MOLLI vs SMART sept_1_mean -246.6 90.6 15.5% -0.771 (-0.865, -0.625) p=1
MOLLI vs SMART sept_2_mean -258.1 91.5 16.1% -0.845 (-0.91, -0.739) p=1
MOLLI vs SMART sept_3_mean -266.2 123.0 15.9% -0.739 (-0.844, -0.578) p=1
T2 vs T2-fast aha1 -0.1 9.0 4.4% 0.276 (-0.014, 0.524) p=0.031
T2 vs T2-fast aha2 -0.2 9.4 5% 0.446 (0.178, 0.654) p<0.001
T2 vs T2-fast aha3 -3.3 10.2 6.1% 0.37 (0.08, 0.602) p=0.007
T2 vs T2-fast aha4 -1.9 10.9 6% 0.489 (0.219, 0.69) p<0.001
T2 vs T2-fast aha5 -0.8 10.4 6% 0.488 (0.218, 0.689) p<0.001
T2 vs T2-fast aha6 -0.1 10.2 5.2% 0.427 (0.151, 0.642) p=0.002
T2 vs T2-fast aha7 -1.2 7.4 3.6% 0.657 (0.462, 0.791) p<0.001
T2 vs T2-fast aha8 -1.2 7.2 3.8% 0.678 (0.491, 0.805) p<0.001
T2 vs T2-fast aha9 -2.8 9.3 5% 0.275 (-0.006, 0.515) p=0.027
T2 vs T2-fast aha10 -2.8 7.9 5% 0.378 (0.106, 0.597) p=0.004
T2 vs T2-fast aha11 -1.1 9.2 4.8% 0.411 (0.145, 0.622) p=0.002
T2 vs T2-fast aha12 -1.0 6.4 3.6% 0.59 (0.372, 0.747) p<0.001
T2 vs T2-fast aha13 -1.5 10.2 4.4% 0.683 (0.492, 0.812) p<0.001
T2 vs T2-fast aha14 0.0 10.8 4.5% 0.671 (0.484, 0.8) p<0.001
T2 vs T2-fast aha15 -3.1 9.6 5.5% 0.671 (0.479, 0.802) p<0.001
T2 vs T2-fast aha16 -2.9 11.0 6.1% 0.523 (0.279, 0.704) p<0.001
T2 vs T2-fast sept_1_mean -1.9 9.1 4.6% 0.532 (0.277, 0.717) p<0.001
T2 vs T2-fast sept_2_mean -2.1 7.8 4.8% 0.513 (0.272, 0.694) p<0.001
T2 vs T2-fast sept_3_mean -0.3 10.7 4.5% 0.707 (0.535, 0.823) p<0.001

Between-recon reproducibility

The bias, reproducibility coefficient (RC), intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC) and 95% confidence interval comparing MOLLI: Std vs DL, T2: Std vs DL, and T2: DL vs GE are tabulated in Table 4. Bland-Altman plots are shown in Figure 4. (Non-inter-system: priority scan A \(\to\) B; inter-system: priority scan B \(\to\) A.) There is strong agreement within the three pairs of comparisons.

Figure 4: Bland-Altman analysis of between-recon reproducibility for T1 and T2
Table 4: Between-recon reproducibility analysis of T1 and T2.
name Bias RC CoV ICC (95% CI) P-value
MOLLI: Std vs DL aha1 -8.4 66.9 0.9% 0.853 (0.751, 0.915) p<0.001
MOLLI: Std vs DL aha2 -1.4 19.3 0.3% 0.986 (0.975, 0.992) p<0.001
MOLLI: Std vs DL aha3 -1.2 10.9 0.3% 0.995 (0.991, 0.997) p<0.001
MOLLI: Std vs DL aha4 3.8 39.5 0.6% 0.955 (0.922, 0.974) p<0.001
MOLLI: Std vs DL aha5 1.4 22.8 0.5% 0.979 (0.962, 0.988) p<0.001
MOLLI: Std vs DL aha6 2.5 75.6 0.8% 0.839 (0.731, 0.906) p<0.001
MOLLI: Std vs DL aha7 -1.9 65.6 1% 0.888 (0.811, 0.935) p<0.001
MOLLI: Std vs DL aha8 2.2 55.4 0.5% 0.864 (0.772, 0.92) p<0.001
MOLLI: Std vs DL aha9 -1.7 14.6 0.3% 0.984 (0.972, 0.991) p<0.001
MOLLI: Std vs DL aha10 -1.0 14.1 0.3% 0.988 (0.979, 0.994) p<0.001
MOLLI: Std vs DL aha11 -3.1 55.8 0.8% 0.838 (0.73, 0.906) p<0.001
MOLLI: Std vs DL aha12 -2.2 38.8 0.5% 0.957 (0.926, 0.976) p<0.001
MOLLI: Std vs DL aha13 -0.3 39.0 0.5% 0.967 (0.943, 0.981) p<0.001
MOLLI: Std vs DL aha14 0.4 49.1 0.5% 0.903 (0.836, 0.944) p<0.001
MOLLI: Std vs DL aha15 -3.0 10.3 0.3% 0.996 (0.993, 0.998) p<0.001
MOLLI: Std vs DL aha16 -0.4 18.9 0.3% 0.993 (0.988, 0.996) p<0.001
MOLLI: Std vs DL sept_1_mean 0.9 26.1 0.3% 0.973 (0.953, 0.985) p<0.001
MOLLI: Std vs DL sept_2_mean 0.1 30.6 0.4% 0.942 (0.901, 0.967) p<0.001
MOLLI: Std vs DL sept_3_mean 0.2 41.5 0.5% 0.927 (0.875, 0.958) p<0.001
T2: Std vs DL aha1 -0.3 2.1 1% 0.962 (0.931, 0.979) p<0.001
T2: Std vs DL aha2 0.1 1.8 0.7% 0.977 (0.959, 0.987) p<0.001
T2: Std vs DL aha3 0.3 3.3 1.1% 0.947 (0.905, 0.97) p<0.001
T2: Std vs DL aha4 0.1 2.1 1% 0.972 (0.951, 0.985) p<0.001
T2: Std vs DL aha5 0.5 5.8 1.7% 0.793 (0.655, 0.881) p<0.001
T2: Std vs DL aha6 0.2 4.5 1.3% 0.838 (0.724, 0.907) p<0.001
T2: Std vs DL aha7 -0.5 2.0 1.1% 0.96 (0.93, 0.977) p<0.001
T2: Std vs DL aha8 -0.1 2.2 0.8% 0.963 (0.935, 0.979) p<0.001
T2: Std vs DL aha9 0.2 2.0 0.8% 0.945 (0.904, 0.968) p<0.001
T2: Std vs DL aha10 0.2 2.0 0.8% 0.946 (0.906, 0.969) p<0.001
T2: Std vs DL aha11 0.2 3.6 1.3% 0.865 (0.773, 0.922) p<0.001
T2: Std vs DL aha12 -0.1 2.5 1.1% 0.925 (0.871, 0.957) p<0.001
T2: Std vs DL aha13 0.1 2.8 1.1% 0.97 (0.945, 0.983) p<0.001
T2: Std vs DL aha14 -0.2 3.4 1.1% 0.959 (0.929, 0.977) p<0.001
T2: Std vs DL aha15 0.2 2.6 1.2% 0.976 (0.958, 0.987) p<0.001
T2: Std vs DL aha16 0.5 5.5 1.6% 0.887 (0.805, 0.936) p<0.001
T2: Std vs DL sept_1_mean 0.1 2.2 0.7% 0.977 (0.958, 0.987) p<0.001
T2: Std vs DL sept_2_mean -0.1 2.2 0.7% 0.953 (0.918, 0.973) p<0.001
T2: Std vs DL sept_3_mean -0.1 2.6 1% 0.98 (0.965, 0.989) p<0.001
T2: DL vs GE aha1 -0.3 2.7 1.5% 0.935 (0.882, 0.965) p<0.001
T2: DL vs GE aha2 -0.8 4.6 2% 0.797 (0.653, 0.885) p<0.001
T2: DL vs GE aha3 -0.9 2.6 1.7% 0.933 (0.879, 0.963) p<0.001
T2: DL vs GE aha4 -1.0 3.9 2% 0.888 (0.803, 0.938) p<0.001
T2: DL vs GE aha5 -1.2 4.0 2.1% 0.849 (0.739, 0.915) p<0.001
T2: DL vs GE aha6 -0.7 3.2 1.7% 0.884 (0.795, 0.936) p<0.001
T2: DL vs GE aha7 -0.3 2.9 1.7% 0.936 (0.886, 0.964) p<0.001
T2: DL vs GE aha8 -0.6 2.1 1.1% 0.957 (0.923, 0.976) p<0.001
T2: DL vs GE aha9 -1.0 4.4 1.7% 0.773 (0.624, 0.868) p<0.001
T2: DL vs GE aha10 -0.9 2.3 1.4% 0.887 (0.803, 0.937) p<0.001
T2: DL vs GE aha11 -0.7 3.7 1.6% 0.848 (0.74, 0.913) p<0.001
T2: DL vs GE aha12 -0.3 2.9 1.6% 0.902 (0.828, 0.945) p<0.001
T2: DL vs GE aha13 -0.4 2.5 1.3% 0.97 (0.943, 0.984) p<0.001
T2: DL vs GE aha14 -0.2 5.2 1.9% 0.881 (0.792, 0.933) p<0.001
T2: DL vs GE aha15 -0.6 3.9 2% 0.879 (0.79, 0.932) p<0.001
T2: DL vs GE aha16 -0.2 4.1 1.9% 0.905 (0.829, 0.948) p<0.001
T2: DL vs GE sept_1_mean -0.4 6.0 2% 0.776 (0.624, 0.872) p<0.001
T2: DL vs GE sept_2_mean -0.9 3.0 1.6% 0.894 (0.816, 0.94) p<0.001
T2: DL vs GE sept_3_mean -0.4 5.0 1.9% 0.924 (0.866, 0.957) p<0.001

Between-reader reproducibility

The bias, reproducibility coefficient (RC), intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC) and 95% confidence interval comparing RVS vs AF for MOLLI and T2 are tabulated in Table 5. Bland-Altman plots are shown in Figure 5. (Non-inter-system: priority scan A \(\to\) B; inter-system: priority scan B \(\to\) A.) The inter-reader agreement is strong.

Figure 5: Bland-Altman analysis of between-reader (RVS vs AF) reproducibility for MOLLI and T2
Table 5: Between-reader (RVS vs AF) reproducibility analysis of MOLLI and T2.
name Bias RC CoV ICC (95% CI) P-value
MOLLI aha1 7.7 22.3 0.7% 0.974 (0.928, 0.991) p<0.001
MOLLI aha2 4.9 69.5 1.5% 0.841 (0.623, 0.939) p<0.001
MOLLI aha3 5.8 43.6 1.1% 0.934 (0.827, 0.976) p<0.001
MOLLI aha4 4.1 82.4 1.8% 0.639 (0.239, 0.856) p=0.002
MOLLI aha5 -2.2 72.7 1.6% 0.721 (0.378, 0.892) p<0.001
MOLLI aha6 6.0 88.8 2% 0.663 (0.279, 0.867) p=0.001
MOLLI aha7 7.3 61.7 1.5% 0.852 (0.662, 0.94) p<0.001
MOLLI aha8 4.1 64.3 1.3% 0.823 (0.604, 0.927) p<0.001
MOLLI aha9 12.1 46.4 1.3% 0.843 (0.635, 0.938) p<0.001
MOLLI aha10 -4.0 45.8 1.1% 0.864 (0.67, 0.948) p<0.001
MOLLI aha11 7.8 88.8 2.1% 0.691 (0.34, 0.875) p<0.001
MOLLI aha12 -1.6 92.9 2.1% 0.678 (0.332, 0.865) p<0.001
MOLLI aha13 -25.5 108.7 2.3% 0.741 (0.428, 0.897) p<0.001
MOLLI aha14 -2.6 51.8 1.4% 0.867 (0.685, 0.948) p<0.001
MOLLI aha15 3.4 27.0 0.8% 0.954 (0.873, 0.984) p<0.001
MOLLI aha16 -5.6 112.2 2.1% 0.673 (0.294, 0.871) p=0.001
MOLLI sept_1_mean 6.8 53.9 1.2% 0.894 (0.737, 0.96) p<0.001
MOLLI sept_2_mean 6.5 68.5 1.3% 0.734 (0.427, 0.891) p<0.001
MOLLI sept_3_mean -4.9 55.8 1.6% 0.852 (0.654, 0.941) p<0.001
T2 aha1 1.0 8.6 3.9% 0.443 (-0.02, 0.753) p=0.03
T2 aha2 0.8 7.8 3.7% 0.6 (0.194, 0.833) p=0.004
T2 aha3 2.2 6.6 4.1% 0.739 (0.423, 0.896) p<0.001
T2 aha4 0.6 5.2 2.7% 0.609 (0.209, 0.837) p=0.003
T2 aha5 -0.1 3.9 2.2% 0.859 (0.661, 0.946) p<0.001
T2 aha6 0.4 5.1 2.6% 0.814 (0.567, 0.928) p<0.001
T2 aha7 0.6 3.7 2.1% 0.859 (0.677, 0.943) p<0.001
T2 aha8 0.9 6.6 3.4% 0.541 (0.137, 0.792) p=0.006
T2 aha9 2.2 3.9 3.1% 0.54 (0.136, 0.792) p=0.006
T2 aha10 0.7 6.9 3% 0.539 (0.135, 0.792) p=0.006
T2 aha11 1.5 5.0 3% 0.274 (-0.184, 0.638) p=0.117
T2 aha12 1.7 3.2 2.5% 0.662 (0.317, 0.853) p<0.001
T2 aha13 -1.6 9.1 4.5% 0.701 (0.343, 0.883) p<0.001
T2 aha14 0.0 7.6 3.6% 0.772 (0.506, 0.905) p<0.001
T2 aha15 0.8 4.2 2.2% 0.831 (0.619, 0.931) p<0.001
T2 aha16 1.1 5.8 3.4% 0.683 (0.312, 0.876) p<0.001
T2 sept_1_mean 1.6 10.2 3.5% 0.591 (0.181, 0.828) p=0.004
T2 sept_2_mean 0.4 3.4 1.8% 0.839 (0.635, 0.934) p<0.001
T2 sept_3_mean -0.6 7.8 3.3% 0.794 (0.548, 0.915) p<0.001